5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
III) During the Variation of your father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Variation) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed into the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
In accordance with the EPA rate schedule, the request should be limited in scope, instead of be supposed for redistribution to the internet or for commercial purposes.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of someday during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness of your alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to generally be the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't react in the least towards the confessional statements of your petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is usually a weak kind of evidence which can be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can also be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners together with a motorcycle at 4.
This unfortunate ambiguity results during the legislation regarding murder and manslaughter to become repugnant with Just about every other.
Because of their position between the two main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.
The recent amendment to Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards click here effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the legislation with contemporary challenges.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
This guide gives precious insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is proven as well as the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the different penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct is not satisfactory but the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in the structured and lawful fashion. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only carried out if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence and the petitioner company responded on the allegations therefore they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot reach out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments from the decrease courts.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and regarded researchers to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.